|
User Lens Reviews Canon 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 USM review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Good Lens for Beginner, Sunday, 17 December 2006 This Lens is "Make in Taiwan", I can not find any of this Lens in the market is "Make in Japan" so far. But, it still worths every penny - Small and not heavy, goes very well with my new XTI. Best product in terms of $$$ and quality.
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Great Zoom Lens, Monday, 13 November 2006
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
As a compromise l;ens this may be all you need - m, Saturday, 26 August 2006 initially I had many issues with this lens but after sending it into Canon for repair it has come back much sharper. This is an issue I've heard from others regarding Canon lenses. The moral is: If the lens has a woble when you get it new, send it in to Canon for their free factory service immediately. While this is infinately better than the kit lens and a steady on zoom, the colors are still not completely accurate. If you are looking for perfect color accuracy you will be dissapointed. The zoom functions quietly and smoothly though and focus is nice throughout. There is a decent Bokeh (for this type lens) at 3.5 and even 4.5 if th4e background is seperated a bit from the forground. The zoom range is good as a walking around, but not quite enough for nature photography. It doesn't have the closeup focus capability you might hope for to get a nice image of a flower nor the zoom capability to get a nice image of a bird or a deer. It's just in between booth of these. For shots of people and places though, it's just right. This has been a very useful lens but if I were making the purchase again, I would go for something that either extended out to 200mm or shot closer in rather than this compromise that is not quite enough of either. As a first lens upgrade from a kit lens, this is a pretty good economical choice. No doubt many people will upgrade to this lens and stop there finding their needs fully satisfied.
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
marvelous lens from Canon, Saturday, 26 August 2006
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
ALL ABOUT VALUE, Tuesday, 25 July 2006 All in all, a great lens at a budet price but it dosn't act like it. Fast focus, fair range, nice size, easy to lug around. I would sugest this lens to any one and first on my list to someone who is not wanting to go crazy on lenses and extras for their camera, and just want to simply get some nice pics without spending all their lunch money. Also the lens takes the same size filters as the kit lens, so if you have spent a few dollers on a few filters for the kit lens your in luck. I know I was happy to still use the 3 filters I've already got.
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Great lens for the price!, Thursday, 08 June 2006 Color accuracy has also GREATLY improved with the 28-105mm. Colors look MUCH more natural with this lens than with the 18-55mm lens. This is particularly true of lighter colors, especially when you go to increase saturation with Photoshop (or other software). Increasing saturation to improve the appearance of dark colors on a picture taken with the 18-55mm would typically make lighter colored objects look VERY unnatural. This sort of problem is MUCH reduced with the 28-105mm. I should also say that this lens appears to overexpose somewhat compared with the 18-55mm. This is more good than bad, however, as it has the effect of making the lens faster. Of course, this lens is not without its drawbacks. I mentioned the slight softness at large apertures, for instance. Also, it is not the fastest lens out there. But then again, what do you expect for the price? And finally, 28mm is not exactly wide angle on a cropped sensor digital SLR like the Rebels or the 20D. But despite these drawbacks, this lens really performs like a champ. And when used in its element (ie higher f-numbers), it works quite well. Also, since it is not an EF-S lens, it will not become a paperweight should you decide to upgrade to a 5D.
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
I'm happy I chose this EF instead of the alternate, Thursday, 01 June 2006 I needed to replace the lens on my Canon Rebel XT D-SLR. The EF-S on first glance seemed like the perfect replacement since Canon produced the EF-S series specifically for the compressed sensor D-SLR line. After weighing the pros and cons of the two, I chose this EF lens largely on the basis of price. It was the right choice, and I haven't found any loss of features or quality. Multiplying the range by 1.6 for a 35mm equivalence (if you have a Rebel XT, 20D or 30D), this model is really just a slightly wide angle to stronger telephoto zoom. (about 45mm-170mm if it was a 35mm film camera) If this range suits you, then this lens is an excellent value over a EF-S wide-angle/telephoto zoom. You'll keep all of the features, save money and have a faster lens. The EF series meshes well with the current line of Canon digital SLRs. In addition, unlike the EF-S series, they are compatible with all of the Canon EOS products including higher-end cameras like the Mark II. SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS FROM WEEKS OF USE: My first concern before purchasing this lens was the MINIMUM FOCUS DISTANCE of 0.5 meters, or approximately 18 inches. I do a lot of macro work transferring images into digital, so I was a tad worried. However, after getting the lens and zooming in, I realized that the focusing distance wasn't really an issue after all. In most cases, I could manage to stand six or so inches further away and still get a highly magnified shot. So that you can see that the macro function works well, I've uploaded an image of a small hamster photographed at 102mm. My second concern was lens QUALITY AND SHARPNESS, particularly in the wide-angle setting near the edges of the photo. This lens exceeded my expectations. So that you can see the quality of this lens, I've uploaded an uncropped picture of the SF Bay Bridge taken at the 28mm wide-angle setting. You'll see that the photo is sharp all the way through the edges of the frame. (it is a web-sized jpeg, so you should take that into consideration and use it mainly to see the sharpness of the photo, particularly near the outside edges) I did get an unexpected bonus with this lens. The MANUAL FOCUS ring is in the front. I love it. Disabling the auto-focus is a snap, and the position and feel of the manual focus is perfect for sports or social activities where the subject is often not the closest object. The ring itself is ridged and made of rubber, making handling a breeze. While I hadn't expected to replace my stock lens so soon, I think it ended up for the best. This lens is actually superior to the one that came with the XT. I lost some wide-angle function but gained much more telephoto. The price is excellent and the quality of the lens is high.
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
This lenses are adorable, Tuesday, 30 May 2006 If you really want to see how good this lens are see the photos I took in Europe. I too around 5000 photos. I posted a few on the web (See link below). For the price I recommend this lens as walk around lens. The zoom is pretty usefull They are very realiable and (almost) very sharp. Get this lens instead of the kit lens (18-55 mm) until you are ready to spend more. Here are some of my pictures taken in Europe with this lens (Images have been compressed): http://www.laplazita.net/europa/
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
I'm sending it back...., Thursday, 23 March 2006 The USM is awesome though and will for sure be an option in whatever lens I choose to buy in place of this one. The focal range of 28-105 was also very nice, but to me the picture quality was not so good.
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Good Zoom Range for a Walk Around Lens, Thursday, 02 March 2006
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Great lens for the Price, Tuesday, 28 February 2006
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Very good lens., Tuesday, 20 September 2005
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Excellent Lens!, Friday, 15 July 2005
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Great lens!!, Tuesday, 01 March 2005
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Good lens for the price, Wednesday, 26 January 2005 This lens is light, but well built. I highly encourage you to buy the lens hood with this lens, as it is prone to flare. Overall, I have been very satisfied with this lens. Not as good as an "L" lens, but at the low price of $250, you can't get better. I am very happy with this lens.
Report this review
Results 46 - 60 of 72
|
Most Popular...
|


