|
User Lens Reviews Canon EF 28-200mm f3.5-5.6 USM review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Lens, great buy for the $$!!, Friday, 08 August 2008
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
1 lens for many events, Friday, 11 July 2008 pro - it's canon, and it covers a lot of range con - it is a heavier lens
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Great Lense, Thursday, 12 June 2008 angle of a 28mm. I use this lense with my Canon 40D. It has very good optics and is very easy to use. A very good value.
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Great lens, Saturday, 31 May 2008 As long as you take care not to let this happen it is a great lens to have.
Report this review
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Great budget lens, Tuesday, 01 April 2008 Its wide to tele coverage reduces the need to take several lenses, making it a good lens for travelling on foot. As for issues with sharpness, unsharp mask in Adobe Photoshop should take care of that. Sure a 24-105mm L and a 70-200mm F/4 L IS would be great, but once you can work photoshop, this lens should suffice until you can save up a few thousand dollars for these two. A speedlite EX430/580 would also be a wise investment with this lens. Why should you care what I think? My relationship with this item:
I own it
Where did you buy this item?: B&H Photo Price paid: 359 When did you buy this item?: March 15, 2008 Conclusions at a glance Would you recommend this Item:
Yes
Pros: Great wide to tele coverage, nice everyday lens Cons: A bit on the soft side
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Probably acceptable for most..., Monday, 14 January 2008 However, if you're a serious hobbyist, and have a desire for tack sharp images, this lens just doesn't cut it. When I had it combined with my Rebel XT, it produced images that were comparable, to slightly better than, old point and shoot. But, even with a tripod, the images produced were too soft for my liking. That said, I still think this is probably a pretty good starter lens - if you're used to the reach given by super zoom point and shoots, this is probably your best option if you don't have thousands of dollars and don't want to carry a bunch of lenses around with you. I'm selling mine and upgrading to a Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L.
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Great zoom lens, Sunday, 25 March 2007
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
A good choice for a walk-around lens, Tuesday, 20 March 2007
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
A good film lens, maybe not so good with digital. , Wednesday, 31 January 2007 The thing about this lens is the greatest asset of the lens is also the greatest weakness. To be able to provide 28mm-200mm at 350-500 bucks, it requires alot of compromises. Its slow indoors or requires flash which for most people is okay. you will get softness if you blow pictures up past 8x10. Its heavy and long. It doesn't have a small depth of focus for your close ups, it needs to be on a tripod for 200mm unless you can hold it very steady and even then you will want a flash. If you want a good all around lens under 400.00 this is your lens. If you want to spend a little more you get IS and USM with the 28-135mm. My feeling is, you take great pictures with a lens you have, not a lens you don't have. I think for begineers and for a fun day just shooting regular pictures, this is a great lens. Save the artsy pictures and the emotional pictures for a 50mm 1.4 or a 85mm 1.8 or a up close picture for the 70-200mm. This is a good all around for good pictures, not great ones.
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Canon Lens, Sunday, 21 January 2007
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Good Initial Results, Thursday, 18 January 2007 I do have to say that, in accordance with other reviews, low light is not a friend of this lens. I haven't done much outdoor photography (due to time contraints, time of the year, etc.), but what I've done has turned out very clear and pleasing. I have a feeling that well-lit outdoor shots is where this lens might excel best. This is definitely a massive upgrade over the kit lens (in focal length, size, weight, and quality), so be prepared for all four. I'm not sure if the price justified the purchase, but I think that if good care is taken of this lens, then over time it will surely pay itself off. Do I recommend? Only if you find the Digital Rebel kit lens too limiting, and want that extra focal length, if you don't mind the extra size, if you have a need for the extra zoom, and are ready for upgrading. Otherwise, practice on the kit lens or a cheaper lens for a while before moving up.
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Only One, Wednesday, 10 January 2007
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Good All-Purpose Lens, Monday, 31 July 2006 However, if - like me - you just happen to have a nice Canon Digital Rebel camera (or equivalent) and enjoy taking decent pictures, this lens will probably work out very well for you. I've taken well over 1000 pictures with it in a couple of weeks, and it has performed very much as expected. For the price, it's perfect for a go-everywhere lens. A few main points. Okay, it's not the best image quality. Even on low/medium ISO it seems a little grainy and its not as sharp as some of the more expensive Canon lenses. It struggles indoors unless you have a good flash unit, but for well-lit outdoor shoots it's works very well. Of course, it would be nice to have a nice L series with IS, but if you can't afford that then this is a very good value lens. Not for the real professionals, but great if you don't take things too seriously and just want a bit more zoom - and, let's face it, who doesn't want a but more zoom!
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
Abso-bloomin brilliant!, Monday, 22 May 2006
Report this review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
High Quality Lens, Tuesday, 03 January 2006
Report this review
Results 1 - 15 of 24
|
Most Popular...
|


