Canon EF 28mm f2.8 review

Nikon release the 18-105mm AF-S DX VR

Nikon release the AF-S DX 18-105mm F/3.5-5.6G ED VR The AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm F/3.5-5.6G ED VR is a new lens designed to partner Nikons D90 DSLR. The Nikkor 18-105mm lens offers a focal length equivalent to 27 to 157.5mm in 35mm format, built-in Vibration Reduction and Silent Wave Motor, and…

More...

Tamron announces new Di lenses for Canon and Nikon

Tamron announces new Di lenses for Canon and Nikon Tamron today have announced two new Di lenses designed for exclusive use on Canon and Nikon (with Built-in AF Motor) small sensor DSLR cameras The SP AF10-24mm Di II, the first-ever ultra wide-angle lens for digital SLRs, features a focal length range with the 16mm ultra wide-angle to 37mm…

More...

Canon announces EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens

Canon announces EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens Canon today has also introduced the EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Zoom lens. With an equivalent focal length of 29-320mm, the lens offers 11x zoom range. It also features a 16 element, 12 group construction including UD and aspherical lens elements and a 4-stop optical Image Stabilizer. This lens has answered…

More...

Nikon 12-14mm and 24-70mm wins EISA awards

Nikon Wins EISA

Nikon Wins European Professional Lens with 2 lenses Both the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm and Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED lenses have won the EISA Professional lens for 2008-2009. Description This pair of Nikkor zooms represents the ideal optical partnership to equip Nikon’s professional full frame cameras. Covering a broad focal range at f/2.8, and delivering very high optical…

More...

Phase One introduces 3.5/45 mm Tilt / Shift lens

Blog >> Lens Review Blog

Phase One introduces 3.5/45 mm Tilt / Shift lens Phase One today have launched the 3.5/45 mm Tilt/Shift lens. Specially designed for the professional photographer, this small, lightweight lens is ideal for location or studio applications. It offers up to 12 mm shift and 8 degrees tilt for maximum flexibility. When used with the Phase One 645 camera…

More...

Tamron announces three Di Full-Size Format lenses

Tamron announces three Di Full-Size Format lenses Tamron today have announced the availability dates of three new Di lens series in Full-Size Format. The Tamron SP AF90mm F/2.8 Di MACRO for Nikon is a high-performance macro lens but also as a medium telephoto lens suitable for all photographic applications including landscape and portraiture. (The lens is already available…

More...

User Lens Reviews

Average user rating from: 9 user(s)


Overall rating (weighted)		3.9
Sharpness		3.6
Build Quality		3.8
AF Speed		4.0
Value for Money		4.1

Add new review

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

Nice lens, sharp photos, slow autofocus, Sunday, 13 July 2008


Overall rating (weighted)		4.0
Sharpness		3.0
Build Quality		3.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		5.0

I picked this lens up because I needed a wider angle without spending too much cash. The overall quality of photos I take using this lens is superb, yet I do find that the autofocus is slow enough to be a real annoyance. I would not recommend this lens for shooting lots of moving subjects, just because with the shallower Depth of field, it's easy for your subject to walk or move out of focus - and the autofocus can't keep up. Overall though, it'a a nice low-light lens and a creative photographer can use it to create some amazing photos. However, if you want better response, look for a lens with USM focusing.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

Great price...almost as good lens., Sunday, 30 December 2007


Overall rating (weighted)		4.3
Sharpness		4.0
Build Quality		4.0
AF Speed		4.0
Value for Money		5.0

Great price for this 2.8 lens if you do a lot of architectural work. On a crop factor body (I used it on a 30D and 40D), it produces virtually no distortion. Only gripes are that is focuses slow and noisy.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful

So-so. But worth considering., Sunday, 06 May 2007


Overall rating (weighted)		3.0
Sharpness		3.0
Build Quality		3.0
AF Speed		4.0
Value for Money		2.0

I bought this lens for a couple of reasons. First of all, I picked it up REALLY cheap used (and you can get it quite cheap even new). Secondly, I really wanted a standard-view lens for my Rebel XT. But honestly, I can't say that I am extremely impressed with it. Simply put, the sharpness is just not there like it is with, say, the 20mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2, or 50mm f/1.4. In fact, sharpness ranges from equal to worse than the 28-105mm (depending on aperture). There also seems to be somewhat of a decentering effect, where the right side of the picture is ESPECIALLY soft. And chromatic aberrations are on the high side. Honestly, I don't now how Canon went wrong with this lens, as the 35mm f/2 is a VERY similar design and actually a GREAT lens. Oh, and like the 35mm f/2, build quality leaves something to be desired.

On the other hand, it IS better than the kit zoom. And even though it really can't beat the 28-105mm in terms of sharpness, it DOES beat that lens in terms of contrast and color saturation. Oh, and it is cheap. So it may at least be worth considering. But overall, I would pass on this lens in favor of the MUCH better 35mm f/2. Of course, the 35mm f/2 is somewhat pricier than this lens (but well worth it).

A good all-around "normal" lens, Thursday, 02 November 2006


Overall rating (weighted)		4.5
Sharpness		4.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		4.0
Value for Money		5.0

If you could only carry one lens for your Canon digital SLR, or you wanted to keep your gear to a minimum, this would be the only lens to carry. Of course, you would be limited in your range of photography, i.e. no large groups of people in small spaces; no sports photos.
Otherwise, this is a very good lens for all-around photography.

it's cheap, but it's GARBAGE, Tuesday, 10 October 2006


Overall rating (weighted)		1.5
Sharpness		1.0
Build Quality		2.0
AF Speed		1.0
Value for Money		2.0

Canon generally makes excellent lenses, but my copy of this lens is awful! Even at f/8 with a fast shutter speed and low ISO, images are blurry when blown up to 100%. It also suffers from severe CA, particularly in bright settings. Yes, this lens is inexpensive, but I can't recommend it at any price. You would do much better to save your money and buy a better lens.

Canon should pull the 28mm f/2.8 off the market.

Good copies of this lens exist, Thursday, 13 July 2006


Overall rating (weighted)		4.5
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		3.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		5.0

I bought two used copies of this lens in an effort to get a good one. Both copies I tested were very sharp and had good contrast although on one the CA was noticably higher than on the other. On the better copy, images are extremely sharp and CA is almost non-existant. (And with CS2's new functions, what CA there is is easy to get rid of.) Although this lens's only downfall is CA, there are copies out there where even this problem is minimized. For a x1.6 camera, such as the 350D, this is a great "50mm" classic prime!

Before you buy this lens!, Wednesday, 05 April 2006


Overall rating (weighted)		3.3
Sharpness		2.0
Build Quality		4.0
AF Speed		4.0
Value for Money		3.0

Make sure you buy it with the knowledge that you won't be able to use it to the full extent a wide angle lens is used to. Otherwise you will be severely disappointed with this lens. But just how so?

I know a photographer that uses this lens for wedding photography with her 10D. For her the lens does the job wonderfully. The lens takes sharp pictures, is light enough to haul around in a wedding, and wide enough on a 1.6 form factor camera to provide sufficient field of view for such event. The field of view on a 1.6 form factor camera would be equivalent to 45mm on full format; almost normal view.

I on the other hand used my 28mm lens for nature photography, and let me tell you the results were not just disappointing but down right useless! Simply stated, you will not be able to use high contrast/saturation landscape and nature pictures that are procuded by this lens. The bright sun will cause sever Chromatic aberration in your pictures. Hence, the fringes of trees and light poles for example will display the dreaded discoloration (with this lens the color is generally purple). Every tree branch at the top corners will become purple at the fringes. Those are truly unacceptable results.

Now for the big question, is it possible that I had a bad copy? Probably not. After being so disappointed I researched this lens extensively (especially on Fred Miranda site) and found that others had the same problem. In fact, its overall score on that site was 7.4 at the time of my research, thus my 3 star rating. After learning the facts I decided to return the lens instead of exchanging it with another one. Since then I have ordered a 17-40 L.

Should you order it? This lens is a great value. In fact, I rank it as a best value lens after the 50mm 1.8 in the lower end range of Canon prime lenses. Nonetheless, don't expect to take stunning nature photos with it; otherwise chromatic Aberration will stun you!

PS. I agree with most of what a previous reviewer mentioned in his post, but wonder if he owns a good copy. This lens has been in production for a while and there may be a difference in quality between various batches out there.

Really nice lens, Monday, 02 January 2006


Overall rating (weighted)		5.0
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		5.0

I had used this lens at night with low light and taken many indoor shots. My camera multiplies the les to 1.6 and it become a 44mm lens. The shots were cystal clear.

Ideal waterfall lens, Saturday, 30 April 2005


Overall rating (weighted)		4.8
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		4.0
Value for Money		5.0

Waterfall lovers will appreciate a 28mm lens, and the Canon f/2.8 is no exception. A 24mm lens often puts you into the spray zone. A 35mm lens isn't as dramatic. I prefer fixed focal length lenses for waterfalls and similar landscapes to eliminate the ghosting that blemishes photos taken with Zoom lenses: this lens has fewer groups/elements, consequently fewer internal reflections. I sometimes couple this lens with a 12mm Kenko extension tube to create dramatic closeups of flowers.

Don't feel the more expensive f/1.4 is a "better" lens. In my experience, the ultrawide aperture lenses are harder to optically correct and seldom noticeably better--but they are noticeably heavier and more expensive. While the wide aperture might help with shooting action, you should ask yourself if a significant fraction of your photos require this. Otherwise you're paying money for nothing.

In short, this inexpensive lens is a solid performer and a great value.

Nikon release the 18-105mm AF-S DX VR

Tamron announces new Di lenses for Canon and Nikon

Canon announces EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens

Nikon 12-14mm and 24-70mm wins EISA awards

Nikon Wins EISA

Phase One introduces 3.5/45 mm Tilt / Shift lens

Blog >> Lens Review Blog

Tamron announces three Di Full-Size Format lenses

Overview

Lens Specifications

Details

Price Tracking

Field of View of this lens

Visualise the Field of View of this lens

Amazon Price US

Amazon Price UK

Most Popular...