Lens Reviews - Nikon 80-400mm VR f4.5-5.6D AF ED

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

It's all we have from Nikon!, Thursday, 22 July 2010


Overall rating (weighted)		4.8
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		4.0
Value for Money		5.0

It's a tough challenge - affordability, great quality and ease of use. This lens is not easy to use!

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful

Rather nice for a tele!, Friday, 07 May 2010


Overall rating (weighted)		4.3
Sharpness		4.0
Build Quality		4.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		4.0

This is my second tele for my D300 - the first one was a 18-200mm DX VR, which is a very nice everyday lens also, but a Bit too short for the types of wildlife photography I do.

All of my other lenses are primes; a 105mm f/2.8, 300mm f/2.8 and a 600mm f/4, of which my 300mm f/2.8 AI-S is my favorite. I use my 300mm for wildlife shots, landscapes and indoor sports, but its a big and heavy manual focus lens that misses a few shots because I can't focus it fast enough sometimes. I really searched and mulled over updating to a 300mm f/2.8 AF-S VR, and even priced out used ones, but decided to try out the Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D VR which cost less than 1/3 the price, thinking that it may be a good lens to use outdoors between my 300mm and 600mm primes that require tripods and get too many wierd looks when I use them in public places.

After reading reviews about how slow the 80-400mm is to focus (I can beat that, try a MF lens sometimes!), and how slow of a lens it is regarding its aperature (ok, it' not a f/2.8, but it's not trying to be one either), I'm glad I bought it anyway because I find that I can take it on trips without a lot of other stuff besides a monopod and extra battery and not miss taking on-the-fly photographs of wildlife or my family at play anymore, especially when and where I ever feel like not lugging the big lenses around.

I think most people would find this lens to be a cost effective way to have a long telephoto that does take sharp photos (especialy at around 300mm at f/8) with a fast focus (I use it on a D300) and the benefits of having VR to boot.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

Rather nice for a tele!, Friday, 07 May 2010


Overall rating (weighted)		3.8
Sharpness		4.0
Build Quality		3.0
AF Speed		4.0
Value for Money		4.0

This is my second zoom tele for my D300 - the first one was a 18-200mm DX VR, which is a very nice everyday lens also, but a bit too short for the types of wildlife photography I do.

All of my other lenses are primes; a 105mm f/2.8, 300mm f/2.8 and a 600mm f/4, of which my 300mm f/2.8 AI-S is my favorite. I use my 300mm for wildlife shots, landscapes and indoor sports, but its a big and heavy manual focus lens that misses a few shots because I can't focus it fast enough sometimes. I really searched and mulled over updating to a 300mm f/2.8 AF-S VR, and even priced out used ones, but decided to try out the Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D VR which cost less than 1/3 the price, thinking that it may be a good lens to use outdoors between my 300mm and 600mm primes that require tripods and get too many wierd looks when I use them in public places.

After reading reviews about how slow the 80-400mm is to focus (I can beat that, try a MF lens sometimes!), and how slow of a lens it is regarding its aperature (ok, it' not a f/2.8, but it's not trying to be one either), I'm glad I bought it anyway because I find that I can take it on trips without a lot of other stuff besides a monopod and extra battery and not miss taking on-the-fly photographs of wildlife or my family at play anymore, especially when and where I ever feel like not lugging the big lenses around.

I think most people would find this lens to be a cost effective way to have a long telephoto that does take sharp photos (especialy at around 300mm at f/8). It does focus fast enough for most shots (I use it on a D300), and it has the benefits of VR to boot. Make sure it works for your camera though, it is a AF-I lens, not a AF-S, thus it won't work on D5000's and several other non-pro level Nikon DSLR's.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

Rather nice for a tele!, Friday, 07 May 2010


Overall rating (weighted)		4.3
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		4.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		3.0

This is my second zoom tele for my D300 - the first one was a 18-200mm DX VR, which is a very nice everyday lens also, but a bit too short for the types of wildlife photography I do.

All of my other lenses are primes; a 105mm f/2.8, 300mm f/2.8 and a 600mm f/4, of which my 300mm f/2.8 AI-S is my favorite. I use my 300mm for wildlife shots, landscapes and indoor sports, but its a big and heavy manual focus lens that misses a few shots because I can't focus it fast enough sometimes. I really searched and mulled over updating to a 300mm f/2.8 AF-S VR, and even priced out used ones, but decided to try out the Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D VR which cost less than 1/3 the price, thinking that it may be a good lens to use outdoors between my 300mm and 600mm primes that require tripods and get too many wierd looks when I use them in public places.

After reading reviews about how slow the 80-400mm is to focus (I can beat that, try a MF lens sometimes!), and how slow of a lens it is regarding its aperature (ok, it' not a f/2.8, but it's not trying to be one either), I'm glad I bought it anyway because I find that I can take it on trips without a lot of other stuff besides a monopod and extra battery and not miss taking on-the-fly photographs of wildlife or my family at play anymore, especially when and where I ever feel like not lugging the big lenses around.

I think most people would find this lens to be a cost effective way to have a long telephoto that does take sharp photos (especialy at around 300mm at f/8). It does focus fast enough for most shots (I use it on a D300), and it has the benefits of VR to boot. Make sure it works for your camera though, it is a AF-I lens, not a AF-S, thus it won't work on D5000's and several other non-pro level Nikon DSLR's.

New update (6/10): Yes, I am glad I bought this lens. I was able to get some good handheld shots of bighorn sheep (see pic sample) in very low morning light while hiking in some very rough terrain that I would not have tried with a tripod and heavier lenses, and another plus is that I didn't have to ask the sheep to wait while I put on an extender.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

Useful as a walkabout lens, Friday, 02 April 2010


Overall rating (weighted)		3.5
Sharpness		3.0
Build Quality		4.0
AF Speed		3.0
Value for Money		4.0

I've had this lens a few years now as well as a few primes and the 80-200 F/2.8 AFS zoom.
The good:
It's rather lightweight compared to the set of lenses it replaces. But much heavier than a compact with a very powerful zoom.
The vibration reduction works quite well.
Distortion is low.
Flare is rather low.
Very sharp wide open from 80mm to about 200mm, pretty good to 300m.
The less good:
The aperture is not that wide, but heck, it's small.
At 400mm you really need to stop down to f/11 to get maximal sharpness and even then it's clearly not sharp as my 400mm prime.
The design seems a little dated as a recent Sony zoom of the same range is said to be noticeably sharper (but wont fit on Nikon cameras!).
The autofocus is rather slow.

Some people say the zoom is quite stiff. This is quite an advantage when you point it upwards, because this prevents creep.

So when I want to make poster sized pictures of some architectural detail I know about beforehand I bring my prime. When I'm on holiday and I want to have it light
I use this one.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

OK, but slow autofocus, Tuesday, 29 December 2009


Overall rating (weighted)		2.5
Sharpness		3.0
Build Quality		3.0
AF Speed		2.0
Value for Money		2.0

I tried this lens out for a few weeks. I was shooting it on a Nikon D300. I found the autofocus was too slow for my liking. The image quality was decent, but fairly soft wide open. The zoom on this thing is great, but the zoom is worthless if you can't get the autofocus to track fast enough for moving objects.

Anyway, if you're looking for a lens with good zoom capabilities and will be photographing mostly still objects, than this lens is great. If you plan to shoot sports with fast action, you will probably be disappointed.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

Great lens, but starting to feel a little dated, Saturday, 05 December 2009


Overall rating (weighted)		3.8
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		3.0
AF Speed		3.0
Value for Money		4.0

I wanted a lens over 200mm for my arsenal and unfortunately, if you stick with the Nikon brand, there aren't too many options. I chose the 80-400, but I have to say that it's the one Nikon lens purchase I've had the most trouble getting excited over. Not that it isn't a great product - it is - it's just that it seemed like a step back in time since this lens hasn't kept up with the features of Nikon's phenomenally good pro lenses throughout the rest of the product line. In the end, I felt like the choice was to "settle" for this product, or spend several times more money on (say) the excellent 200-400 zoom instead. Or, I suppose you could wait for the next upgrade, but I've already been waiting a few years with no result.

The lens itself is large and heavy, somewhat "thicker" than say, a 70-200 2.8 - but not by a huge amount. It feels balanced on any of Nikon's larger cameras, but it is quite a handful. Unlike some, I find the tripod collar adequate, although I understand many recommend the Kirk collar as an important upgrade. Honestly, I tend to hand-hold the lens more often than not, so I usually have the tripod collar removed altogether. I find it's large enough to get in the way of where I'd naturally want to put my hands. The other comment on construction quality is that it really looks like a "legacy" product. Not being an AFS focusing system, it sports that old "M/A" focus control, and it also still has a manual aperture selector. Which isn't to say that it's not a high quality lens - it is, it's just showing its age. Otherwise, the controls operate smoothly and it does feel to be built to last.

From an optical point of view, I found the lens to perform better than I expected. At both extremes (80 and 400), I notice photos are a little soft in the corners with the lens wide open, but if you use f/8 or smaller, results are uniformly sharp corner to corner (this is only really noticeable on an FX sensor...DX cameras are very good even wide open). Contrast and color are also good, and images generally have that "pop" you get from any top quality lens. I have the latest 70-200 2.8 lens, and at 200mm, I'd say that images from the 80-400 are nearly - but not quite - as good overall. The 80-400 is slightly less contrasty, making some shots appear a little "flat", and the 80-400 also seems slightly more prone to flare when pointed in the direction of a bright light source.

I find the VR system works well, and with the lens zoomed out to 400mm, I can usually get sharp results with shutter speeds in the vicinity of 1/100 second, maybe a little less.

As everyone else points out, the autofocus system is somewhat slow and noisy if you're used to AFS lenses. At longer focal lengths in darker spots, it also tends to hunt. I've learned to simply switch off the autofocus and use the manual controls in these situations.

Overall, I guess I'm happy with this lens, but this is one of those lenses that I'll be looking to upgrade as soon as Nikon comes out with an AFS version that's hopefully about a stop faster and not triple the price.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

Love this lens, Monday, 23 November 2009


Overall rating (weighted)		5.0
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		5.0

This lens has excellent sharpness and fine color/contrast handling. It will a perfect every day lens.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful

Great Lens, Tuesday, 06 October 2009


Overall rating (weighted)		5.0
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		5.0

Very good lens if you take the time to learn how to use it correctly. Ignore reviews of people having delivery problems, which is the reason this lens only has 4 stars so far.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful

Better to wait for an updated model, Monday, 10 August 2009


Overall rating (weighted)		3.3
Sharpness		4.0
Build Quality		4.0
AF Speed		3.0
Value for Money		2.0

I didn't want to wait and now I wish I had. I am using this lens with my D90 to take nature photos. I like to photograph birds and dragonflies and wanted to get this lens for the extra reach it would have over my 75 - 300mm lens. Like other reviewers have commented, it is noisy and slow compared to my other lens. I'm just an amateur and so I depend on the autofocus. It is hard to get this lens to focus on a flying bird and it goes out of focus faster than it goes into focus. It doesn't do well with low contrast and small subjects. It seems to hesitate between shots of a moving object. It does get closer, but I haven't gotten a shot yet that I would say made this lens worth the money I spent in buying it. At times it doesn't communicate with the camera and I have to take the lens off, rotate a ring and then replace the lens. I might have to do this twice before it works because it gives 2 different error messages that require me to rotate the ring in the opposite direction. It is a lot heavier than my 75 - 300mm lens. Because the extension is made of metal, it seems to retain the cold from inside, so that when I go outside, the lens fogs worse than my other lens. If you're impatient like me, then you will probably go ahead and buy this model since there is no telling when the newer model will be produced. If you aren't taking action photos or of small objects, then you might really like this lens.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful

Nikon 80-400mm VR Zoom Review, Tuesday, 26 May 2009


Overall rating (weighted)		5.0
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		5.0

This is a very good lens with the Nikon quality as expected. It produces sharp crisp pictures - reference D300 camera and is easy to use. The weight and size of the lens may not be for everyone for day to day use.

If you are looking for a good lens to add to your kit, this is an excellent choice.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful

Great Nikon Quality, Thursday, 09 April 2009


Overall rating (weighted)		4.3
Sharpness		3.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		4.0

The optical and mechanical quality of this lens is nothing short of fantastic. I have been very pleased with the results of this lens. Great sharpness and nice contrast. The lens is a bit heavy but the VR allows one to hand hold it with impressive results even at 400mm. If you need the extra reach of 400mm, this lens will not disappoint you.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful

Nikon.....is Photography!!!!!, Saturday, 28 March 2009


Overall rating (weighted)		5.0
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		5.0

In the early spring and into the summer, I spend most of my spare time working on a raptor nesting program. I look for the nests of various birds of prey, (hawks, eagles, falcons, and owls) gps their positions and photograph the adult and young. To get a better image of these beautiful birds I bought the Nikon 80-400mm lens. I haven't been disappointed. I get good sharp hand held photos, thanks to the VR capability. It is a little slow on the focus but nothing to stop me from getting some great shots of bird sitting and in flight. I recently bought a Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 D ED lens. This lens is very, very sharp. I was surprised when comparing the two lens side by side. It is almost impossible to tell which lens took which photo. Both the Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 D ED, and the 80-400mm VR lenses are a tribute to Nikon high standards of excellence.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful

Manual Focus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Tuesday, 17 March 2009


Overall rating (weighted)		5.0
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		5.0

I purchased this after selling the famous 70-200mm monster because I wanted the feature of 400mm. I was hesitant to make the purchase because of the noted sluggish Automatic Focus - and it is true. But now I use it solely with manual focus and usually a monopod and the reults are just incredible. I have taken beautiful bird and wildlife photos as well as far away details that I had never successfully photographed.

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful

Excellent Lens!, Monday, 09 February 2009


Overall rating (weighted)		4.8
Sharpness		5.0
Build Quality		5.0
AF Speed		5.0
Value for Money		4.0

Not sure why everyone is saying this is an expensive lens.. Has anyone priced dedicated 400mm lenses?.. They're in the $10,000 range. For the price I think this is an amazing lens. I bought it to shoot car racing and it pulls the action in close. love it!

Was this review helpful to you? yes

Report this review

Overview

Lens Specifications

Details

Price Tracking

USA Lens Price History

UK Lens Price History

Field of View of this lens

Visualise the Field of View of this lens

Amazon Price US

Amazon Price UK